Prevent radiation carcinogenesis and dismantle the base station?
Chengdu Huaying Sunshine Community is located in the center of Chengdu. Due to its superior location, the housing prices are relatively high. However, the residents of this community did not feel the slightest joy, because some residents in the community strongly resisted the operators to build base stations and maliciously damaged the communication infrastructure. The three operators United tower company interrupted cell phone signals under the condition of ineffective communication.
Is base station radiation really harmful to health? Although government departments and operators have made science popularization again and again, there are still many people who are unwilling to believe. At the press conference held by the State New Office on October 23, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology clarified the issue of mobile phone signal radiation in Chengdu Huaying Sunshine Community. According to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, all the base station equipment of the three major operators are strictly tested by the state, and there is no problem of excessive radiation. In general, as long as the human body and the base station maintain a distance of more than 5 meters, the received base station radiation is almost negligible.
Is it really good for some residents to insist on dismantling the base stations? Let us give you a simple example. Suppose two people are talking. When two people are one meter apart, one person can hear the other without speaking too loudly. But when the distance between two people reaches 10 meters, in order to let each other hear their own voice, the voice must be louder. The relationship between the base station and the mobile phone is very similar to that of the two people. When the base station is close to the mobile phone, the signal sent by the mobile phone to the base station will not be too strong, and the radiation generated by the mobile phone to the human body is naturally very limited. But when the base station is far away from the mobile phone, although the mobile phone receives the signal from the base station is weak (equivalent to less radiation), in order to enable the base station to receive the signal from the mobile phone, the mobile phone will greatly increase the transmission power of the signal (equivalent to talking loudly). Because the power of the signal is inversely proportional to the square of the distance, the signal emitted by the mobile phone may increase thousands of times. When you call, the human body is directly exposed to the phone, and the impact can be imagined. In other words, the farther away the base station is from the cell phone, the more radiation the human body will receive. The intention to demolish the base station is to hurt yourself.
Is the infrastructure built by operators built in accordance with the law? Is the base station radiation conforming to the national standard? If the answer is yes, then there is no fault in building the base station. Facing the unwarranted accusation of some residents, the operators, instead of striving justifiably and using legal means to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, confront passively through a comprehensive disconnection. We can not help but ask: this side has just been built, there are some residents and media protests condemned immediately demolition, this disassembly caused by the loss of who is responsible for? Demolition of the base station is in compliance with the "public opinion" of some residents, then the base station demolition needs more mobile phone signals can not communicate, the rights of a larger number of people do not need to be protected? In case of emergency, who will bear the consequences of no signal? In a sense, breaking the net completely damages the interests of more people and should be cautious.